Readings: CD 1.1 Sec. 1-4
The
Church should fear God and not fear the world.
But only if and as it fears God need it cease to fear the world. CD 1.1.3,73
It
is evident from the beginning that Barth’s chief concern in writing the CD. He
is concerned first and foremost with the Church of Jesus Christ. Many of us
like to think of ourselves as pastor-theologians. Barth was the real thing. From the very first word, his concern is with
the church and how it proclaims and lives into the Word of God. He ends section 3 with one of my favorite
quotes, “Non in dialectica
complacuit Deo salvum facere populum suum.” Loosely translated it means, “It has
not pleased God to save [his] people through [theological] arguments.”
God
saves God’s people through faith and our theology is an expression of that
faith. One of the most fundamental expressions of that faith is the
proclamation of God’s Word in the church.
In other words, preaching is fundamental to the faithfulness of the
church. Barth reaches this conclusion
with a winding and often confusing (shocker!) discussion of the failings of both
Roman Catholic and Modernist/pietistic preaching. Ultimately, he arrives at the
conclusion that traditional (as opposed to modern evangelical) Reformed and
Lutheran theologies of preaching find the Goldilocks place on the spectrum
between aloof Catholic preaching and overly-sentimentalized and personalized
pietistic preaching. The trouble with Roman Catholic preaching for Barth is
that it relegates the proclamation of the word to a backwater behind ritual and
sacrament. For the Modernist/pietistic
traditions, the preacher becomes the point.
(Here we see a rejection of Phillips Brooks’ famous description of
preaching as “truth communicated through personality.”)
Hidden
in the midst of this long discussion of the theological project and the nature
of proclamation is a warning to the Church.
The Church should fear God and not fear the world. It is a warning that grows out of the
conclusion above that the traditional Reformed and Lutheran churches occupy a
unique place where the Word might be
most rightly proclaimed. The inherent
danger of being a Church where the Word of God is rightly preached means that
it is from that Church that the Word of God might be rightly heard.
That
is a dangerous thing.
The
word of God rarely comforts the comfortable.
It does not seek to affirm the self-satisfied and power is given no
quarter in the gospel of Christ. The
Word of God rightly proclaimed declares a truth that is God’s and God’s alone
and cannot be imitated in the world. To have faith in the Word of God is by
definition to reject the words of the World.
Writing in the context of Europe in
the post WWI era and the years of Hitler’s assent, Barth knew what it meant to
live under threat from the world and the consequences that might befall the
church if it dared to proclaim the Word of God over and against the word of the
world. So he offers his stark warning.
I wonder how often we really heed
that advice? How often do we preachers proclaim the Word of God with Barth’s
warning in mind? We all try to proclaim
boldly and let the chips fall where they may, but I would wager to say that I
am not the only one who, from time to time, keeps a firm hand on the reigns just
in case.
Now to be fair, the government (the
world) is not getting ready to pour through the front doors of the church and
clap us in irons and drag us away. The
world is not about to shut down our churches or silence its preachers or outlaw
our faith (despite the Chicken-little-esq protests from some of the more hysterical
corners of the church). We do not live
under the kind of threat that so many of Barth’s colleagues did, but still we
keep a hand on the reigns always ready to pull back a little bit if we run too
far afoul of “the world.”
The reality for many preachers is
that the “world” we fear is not government or culture or even society as a
whole. It is that person without whose
gift the budget will fall into deficit.
It is that one louder than the others voice in the congregation whose
opinions are rarely in line with our own.
It is the fear that we move from preaching to “meddling.” Those people in our churches are no more of an
existential threat than the feds, yet we still fear them and too often preach
out of that fear even though we know that we are called to this sort of bold
proclamation that is formed by an ethic in which the Church fears God and not the
world.
So
why not let loose the Word of God and let the chips fall where they may?
Pastoral
care.
I
agree with Barth that we are called to fear God and not the world. If our
unwillingness to push boundaries in our preaching or challenge the assumptions
of the age is rooted in fear of the consequences at the hands of the world,
then our fear is misplaced. But if our hand on the reigns is there not out of
fear of the world but out of care of our people, I think we can safely embrace
Barth’s charge while also responding to the needs of the people God has put in
our charge.
Part
of the Word of God we proclaim is the love of God for all of God’s people. Our preaching should take seriously those
things in the world needing the challenge of the gospel, however we should
always remember that there is more gospel to be understood than the gospel we understand. In other words, there is more to see of the
Word of God than what can be seen from where we stand in any given moment. To respect the differences in our midst and
to respect those people who think differently than we do is part of the living
out of our proclamation.
As a pastor, I have had to learn to
trust my listener as much as I trust myself as a speaker and, in doing that,
trust the Holy Spirit to move my words in and through the heart of the listener
in a way that communicates the Word of God in a loving and hopeful way. Doing
that has allowed me to loosen up the reigns and proclaim the Word of God with
greater freedom. It has allowed me to fear the world less and God a little
more.
Not
everyone who hears me preach agrees with me.
That’s
ok.
That’s
church.
No comments:
Post a Comment